Sydney University accused of antisemitism

The controversy centres on Nick Riemer, a linguistics lecturer and union official, and John Keane, a politics professor. Riemer, an outspoken supporter of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel for decades, has been accused of creating a divisive atmosphere with his public statements. For example, the day after last year’s October 7 terrorist attacks in Israel, Riemer argued that condemning the “Palestinian resistance” would unjustly imply that their cause is “unjust.” Keane faced criticism for allegedly sharing an image of the Hamas flag on social media, which some interpreted as supportive of the group. He has also been accused of doxing by allegedly publishing an internal email revealing personal information about Jewish academics.

In a further challenge to Vice-Chancellor Mark Scott’s leadership of Sydney University, Jewish staff and students allege that the university is vicariously liable for the reported breach of the Racial Discrimination Act (RDA). In September, Scott admitted to a parliamentary inquiry that he had “failed” Jewish students and staff.

The legal team supporting the complainants includes former Federal Court judge Ron Merkel and barrister Adam Butt. Last year, Butt successfully argued that the leadership of Brighton Secondary College had breached the Racial Discrimination Act by failing to protect students from antisemitic bullying.

In response to the criticism, the University of Sydney has publicly committed to addressing all forms of discrimination, including antisemitism. A university spokesperson noted that an external review of the institution’s policies is underway, aiming to improve responses to incidents of racial discrimination on campus. However, critics contend that the university’s reaction has been inadequate, with some arguing that administrators have been slow to act despite increasing concerns about antisemitism.

The controversy has drawn attention from politicians across Australia, some of whom are urging the university to take more decisive action and are considering possible legislative changes to better address antisemitism on campuses. As the case unfolds, it is expected to be closely watched, with hopes it will lead to a more inclusive campus environment.