Following intense questioning by Counsel Assisting the Coroner Anthony Crocker, Mr Coyne admitted the statement and evidence he provided to the CCC was not correct.
“Does that mean what you told to the CCC was not true?” Mr Crocker asked.
“In hindsight, yes,” Mr Coyne replied.
When asked why he signed an official statement that provided misleading impressions, Mr Coyne said “I shouldn’t have signed it”.
“I was under a lot of pressure, under a lot of stress,” he said.
Story wouldn’t ‘withstand scrutiny’
Frontline staff at Unit 18 had told the CCC inquiry and the first part of the coronial inquest that other detainees often covered their cell cameras, which made it impossible to monitor them, even if they needed constant surveillance due to their risk of self-harming.
Unit 18 manager Christine Mitchell said issues around the safety of the facility were brought up with management “time and time again”.
At least two officers gave evidence to the CCC that it was an incredibly common occurrence.
“On any night shift I’ve done, there would be at least 90 per cent of the cameras covered by toilet paper every night,” the acting senior officer on duty that night said.
On Tuesday, Mr Crocker put to Mr Coyne that when he gave evidence at the CCC he did not know the evidence of other staff and youth custodial officers.
“But when you heard them give evidence [at the first part of the coronial inquest] you realised the story you told the CCC would not withstand the scrutiny in the inquest?”
“Yes,” Mr Coyne replied.
Mr Crocker pressed on, telling Mr Coyne: “You knew it would be an impossible sell to maintain that story?”
“Yes,” the former superintendent conceded.